12 Years to Save the World

aquatic coral

Twelve years – that’s how long the global community has left to contain rising temperatures before we risk a full-blown climate change catastrophe, a new report has found.

Research handed down by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) earlier this week reveals that when it comes to targets and policies, we’re simply not doing enough to curb climate change. Time is running out, and urgent action is required if we have any hope of curtailing global warming, the report authors warn.

The IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C is the first in a series of reports conceptualised as part of the Paris Agreement back in 2016. Designed to monitor and evaluate targets set out in the monument pact, the report will also provide a foundation for an upcoming review of the Agreement at the Katowice Climate Change Conference in Poland in December.

The five-chapter document is a colossal effort – 91 authors and review editors from 40 countries globally contributed to the research. Citing more than 6,000 scientific references and incorporating more than 42,000 expert and government review comments, it’s difficult to dispute the report’s findings that we’re charting a dangerous course towards climate disaster. “It’s a line in the sand and what it says to our species is that this is the moment we must act now,” Debra Roberts, co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group II told The Guardian UK this week.

Temperatures rising

This latest latest chapter of climate research confirms our worst fears regarding rising temperatures and the impact of global warming on natural and human ecosystems. The magic number, 1.5 degrees Celsius, refers to the degree by which global temperatures can be permitted to rise on pre-industrial levels before the full effects of climate change are felt.

The report finds that our planet is on-track to warm by an estimated 3 or 4 degrees – far higher than the 1.5 to 2-degree range 195 nations pledged for in Paris. Even if temperatures are contained within the 1.5-degree threshold, the report finds, our planet is poised to change in ways unprecedented. Policymakers have a dozen years left to implement interventions before global warming reaches a critical, no-point-of-return level.

In climate terms, a variance of 0.5 degrees can literally mean the difference between life and death. At 2 degrees, insects are twice as likely to lose half their habitat, which could have irreversible effects not only on ecosystems, but also on the global food system that relies on insects to pollinate crops. At 2 degrees, coral loss is projected to reach an astonishing 99%. Capping the temperature climb at 1.5 degrees, by contrast, could mean that 10% of coral has a chance to survive.

Across the board, incremental rises in temperature are correlated with an increased risk of extreme weather events including drought, coral die off, ice melt, and coastal flooding from rising sea levels. If global temperatures rise by 2 degrees, already threatened ecosystems will come under even greater stress, which could have devastating effects on biodiversity and adverse impacts on human health and wellbeing.

Progress on Paris?

Climate Action Tracker, an interactive site that monitors individual countries’ advancement towards fulfilling the Paris Agreement, shows that as of October 2018, only two countries, Morocco and The Gambia, are currently operating in-line with a 1.5-degree temperature cap. A handful of other states are 2-degree compatible; but the bulk of countries are deemed to be insufficient in their efforts. Australia sits in the insufficient category, alongside New Zealand, the EU, Norway, and six other nations.

Without a major effort to refocus targets, climate change threatens to thwart our progress towards eradicating poverty and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals. This new report urges nations to revise their strategies and aim for the more ambitious end of the Paris spectrum.

Australia responds

The Australian Government’s initial response to the IPCC Special Report has been disheartening to say the least. Rejecting the IPCC’s call to phase out coal power by 2050, neither major political party has fully committed to transitioning to 100 percent renewable sources. It’s yet another blow after emissions reductions targets were abandoned in August, leaving Australia without clear objectives after 2020 when the current renewable energy targets expire.

This further fuels the prediction that Australia will fall short of its pledge to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 26 to 28 percent by 2030. The IPCC’s new research puts this into devastatingly clear perspective – particularly when you consider that slightly more ambitious targets could spell a chance to save one of the planet’s greatest ecosystems, the Great Barrier Reef. “Never before have the Australian people been faced with such a momentous decision,” former UN Climate Chief told the ABC’s ‘Matter of Fact’ on Wednesday. “Do you want the Great Barrier Reef, or do you want the largest aquatic cemetery in the world?”

Don’t give up the fight

While it’s easy to feel discouraged by the Special Report’s findings and the reaction from some policymakers, the IPCC is urging the public not to give up on fighting for climate justice.

The IPCC Special Report concludes by mapping out four feasible pathways to capping the temperature rise at 1.5 degrees. Key interventions include reforestation, a shift to electronic transportation and renewable energy, as well as fast-tracking the development of carbon capture technologies. “The next few years are probably the most important in our history,” the IPCC’s Debra Roberts Tweeted on the day of the report’s publication.

In 2019, the IPCC will release more findings specific to the impact of climate change on our oceans and land resources. Let’s hope that some significant progress towards controlling rising temperatures has been made by then.

Download the full IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C here.

 


WORDS: EMILY LUSH PHOTO: JASON MACRO

You might also like

JOIN OUR MAILING LIST

Brighten up your inbox with our not-too-frequent emails featuring Peppermint-related news, events, competitions and more!

explore

More articles

Handcrafted on the NSW North Coast, Ruco Paints brings sustainability and artistry together through vegan paints, refillable ceramic pots and small-batch colour runs. Founder Marlena Taylor shares why ‘living a making’ matters.
Fancy an intentional refresh of the knicknacks and heirlooms you surround yourself with, at home or in your shopfront? The Life Instyle team share their insights about the design shifts, materials and values-led brands shaping what’s next and best.
The loss of a furry bestie cuts deep, as our Founding Editor-in-chief Kelley Sheenan knows. In Issue 64, Kelley wrote about the lessons they leave us, from dealing with fascists, napping, and the power of setting – and keeping – boundaries.
Putting together our annual Stitch Up brings on all the feels! We feel humbled that you’ve chosen to sew Peppermint patterns, we feel inspired by the versions you’ve created and we feel proud of you.

Look, I don’t want to make anyone panic but IT’S DECEMBER!!! If you’re planning to give homemade gifts, you’re going to have to act fast. …

For Noosa-based designer and upcycler extraordinaire Jaharn Quinn, the perfect holiday had to tap into her obsession with timeless, elevated and sustainable slow design. Enter Eurail and a grand European adventure!

Hang out with us on Instagram

As the world careens towards AI seeping into our feeds, finds and even friend-zones, it's becoming increasingly hard to ignore.⁠
⁠
We just wanted to say that here at Peppermint, we are choosing to not print or publish AI-generated art, photos, words, videos or content.⁠
⁠
Merriam-Webster’s human editors chose 'slop' as the 2025 Word of the Year – they define it as “digital content of low quality that is produced usually in quantity by means of artificial intelligence.” The problem is, as AI increases in quality, it's becoming more and more difficult to ascertain what's real and what's not.⁠
⁠
Let's be clear here, AI absolutely has its place in science, in climate modelling, in medical breakthroughs, in many places... but not in replacing the work of artists, writers and creatives.⁠
⁠
Can we guarantee that everything we publish is AI-free? Honestly, not really. We know we are not using it to create content, but we are also relying on the artists, makers and contributors we work with, as well as our advertisers, to supply imagery, artwork or words created by humans. AI features are also creeping into programs and apps too, making it difficult to navigate. But we will do our best to avoid it and make a stand for the artists and creatives who have had their work stolen and used to train AI machines, and those who are now losing work as they are replaced by this energy-sapping, environment-destroying magic wand. ⁠
⁠
Could using it help our productivity and bottom line? Sure. And as a small business in a difficult landscape, that's a hard one to turn down. We know other publishers who use AI to write stories, create recipes, produce photo shoots... but this one is important to us. ⁠
⁠
'Touch grass' was also a Merriam-Webster Word of the Year. We'll happily stick with that as a theme, thanks very much. 🌿